← All sources

Video source notes

Four teams. One was
lying about which side.

Most of this story survives only in community-maintained records written by the people involved. That is stated here as plainly as it is stated in the video.

Thumbnail for I Watched 4 Teams Destroy A Server
The video thumbnail, extracted from the upload.

The two days

Baited on the 3rd, peaked on the 4th.

Dates and sequence from the community war record · fan-edited, not official
3 Aug 2026
baiting begins
4 Aug 2026
largest flood machine built
~2 hrs
to cover most of the map
4
teams by the end
The community record ↗

A server owner fighting his own audience.

The flooding on 3 August 2026 was not carried out by a rival server or an outside group. According to the community record, a large-audience creator and his moderators baited viewers — including the server’s own — into building flood machines, and the next day the largest machine yet went up. Four factions came out of it: Flood, Drain, Lava, and Obsidian, the last of which had been Team Flood under a different name.

Two things make this different from ordinary griefing. Griefing is not a rule break on DonutSMP, so there was no plugin to invoke and no rollback to demand. And thousands of new water source blocks appearing at once degrades tick rate, so the flood made the server slower to play while people were trying to fight it.

“He never really had an army. He had an audience, and audiences change their mind.”

The betrayal — two players sitting in Team Obsidian while working with Team Drain — is the part with the weakest sourcing in the whole story. It appears in the community war record and the people named have not confirmed it themselves. The video says so on screen; this page repeats it rather than burying it in a footnote.

Primary sources

Mechanics anyone can check.

01

Sponge Primary

Absorption radius, saturation, and drying in a furnace or the nether — the reason clearing water is a manual loop rather than a machine you point and leave.

Minecraft Wiki ↗
02

Water Primary

The source-block spreading rule that makes flooding self-sustaining once placed.

Minecraft Wiki ↗
03

Flood machine schematic Artifact

Published machine files, evidence the design was distributed rather than improvised.

MineSchematic ↗

Community records

Evidence that people said things.

Usable as proof the war was described this way by its participants — not as proof the descriptions are accurate.

04

“Donut SMP War” Curated

The fan wiki this account leans on: the 3 August baiting, the 4 August machine, the two-hour flood, the four teams, the unfollowings, and the claim that two Team Obsidian members were working with Team Drain. Entirely community-entered.

Fan wiki ↗
05

Team Flood’s own site Curated

Promotional material from one faction. Cited for framing and organisation only.

flooddonutsmp.net ↗
06

The drainers’ guide Secondary

The other faction’s public material, including the naming problem that made drain techniques hard to find.

draindonutsmp.com ↗
07

“This is why Team Flood will lose on DonutSMP” Secondary

Creator coverage arguing the drain case. Used for the shape of the argument, not for figures.

YouTube ↗
08

Coverage of the owner’s position Secondary

Creator upload on DrDonut and Team Drain after the war. Secondary commentary.

YouTube ↗
09

Tracked player counts Primary

Independent population data for the months surrounding the war.

minecraft-stats.com ↗

Conflict log · what the sources dispute

Where the sources disagree.

This is the least verifiable story on the channel and it is presented that way in the video too.

ClaimWhat the video saysWhat the sources sayPosition
The double agentsstated, with an explicit note that the people involved have not confirmed itappears only in the community war recordReported as a community claim. Not as established fact.
Name spellingsCruse, Splinkthe wiki renders one of them CruzSpelling unresolved; both forms appear in community sources.
A one-billion in-game scamnot mentionedthe community record also alleges a $1,000,000,000 in-game scam between two of the named playersLeft out of the video — single-source and unrelated to the flood argument.
Bounties from the ownermentioned without a figureamounts appear in community talk onlyNo number stated, deliberately.
How much is still underwaterunknownnobody has published a figure for flooded or drained areaStated as unknown.

Every date and faction name on this page traces to a fan-edited wiki. It is cited because it is the only continuous record that exists, and it should be read as the participants’ own account of a war they were fighting.